On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Andrew Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 2008/11/13 Jay Litwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Since I believe in global warming and I see a contest between it and
> > economics, I see a very hot dispute that really should be off-loaded.
> There
> > are so many other places for volatile information to go. In other words,
> if
> > someone did [[global warming]], I think they should expect to end up on
> > another site, unless the article is restricted to history.
>
> I think this is going to end in tears - where do we draw the line? Do
> we just not talk about global warming; do we talk about it as
> something that is believed to have happened up to and including last
> week; do we talk about it and imply it may continue to happen; do we
> talk about it in general terms in the future but give no numbers?
>
> I'm not sure this approach is helpful; it tries to deal with a small
> set of specific (percieved) problems by applying a draconian general
> rule. I mean, take cosmology. We'd be a shoddy encyclopedia if we
> didn't talk about the [[heat death of the universe]], a very
> well-known concept... but it's entirely hypothetical, it exists as a
> paper theory with some substantiating numbers, and it's several
> billion years ahead.


Talking about the future is fine, as long as it is grounded in reliable
sources in the present. I think the original intent of WP:CRYSTAL was to
avoid original research and to avoid articles about future events becoming
too disconnected from the present and becoming "in-universe" (to borrow a
phrase from the debates about articles on fictional topics). In other words,
having an article about a future scenario, or an alternate history, or an
alternate reality, or a fictional topic, should always be securely grounded
in what people have said in the past and are saying now.

Carcharoth
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to