2008/12/8 Gregory Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Thomas Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/12/8 Durova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Overall, good.  I'll also be blunt: the 'experiment' speculation at the end
>>> handed her a very strong close for the end of the interview.  Everyone's a
>>> critic (and these things are so much easier to second guess after the fact),
>>> yet if another interview such as this comes up it would make a stronger
>>> finish to wonder how many other websites had been blocked by this
>>> organization's dubious assessments without appeal, and ask whether they're
>>> really qualified to play nanny to the public.
>>
>> Apparently there is a way to appeal, but from I can tell nobody wants
>> to tell us what it is.
>
> How do we appeal whatever else they might be blocking?  For all we
> know there could be dozens of other articles blocked now or in the
> future.
>
> We only know that this page is being blocked because the traffic
> hijacking caused collateral damage and someone took a lucky guess.

True, right of appeal doesn't help much with the right to know what
you are charged with.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to