Thomas Dalton wrote: > 2008/12/8 Gregory Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Thomas Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> 2008/12/8 Durova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>>> Overall, good. I'll also be blunt: the 'experiment' speculation at the end >>>> handed her a very strong close for the end of the interview. Everyone's a >>>> critic (and these things are so much easier to second guess after the >>>> fact), >>>> yet if another interview such as this comes up it would make a stronger >>>> finish to wonder how many other websites had been blocked by this >>>> organization's dubious assessments without appeal, and ask whether they're >>>> really qualified to play nanny to the public. >>>> >>> Apparently there is a way to appeal, but from I can tell nobody wants >>> to tell us what it is. >>> >> How do we appeal whatever else they might be blocking? For all we >> know there could be dozens of other articles blocked now or in the >> future. >> >> We only know that this page is being blocked because the traffic >> hijacking caused collateral damage and someone took a lucky guess. >> > > True, right of appeal doesn't help much with the right to know what > you are charged with.
In that case you would be appealing against arbitrary action. Not knowing what you are charged with is a common characteristic of arbitrary action. Ec _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
