> > On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:58 PM, Fred Bauder wrote: > >> What if the journal is a journal of opinion and what if Professor >> Hausfleish's reputation is built on opinion pieces? > > If the journal is a journal of opinion (which I am taking to mean not > peer-reviewed), and Professor Hausfleish's work is based on such work, > he will fail to get tenure at most Universities and quickly find > himself out of a job, which generally brings to a close one's research > career as well. > > Which is to say, largely a non-issue. I mean, we should not deal > heavily in un-peer reviewed work from scholars who have not built a > reputation for peer-reviewed work. That's true. > > But that is not, generally speaking, the bulk of what we'd be looking > at if we were looking at journal articles. > > However peer reviewed work is, by its nature, not simply opinion. > > -Phil >
No, I mean a journal of opinion which IS peer reviewed, and an authority whose literary criticism has passed such review. In other words, considered sound, or at least interesting, by a committee. Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
