On Dec 12, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Fred Bauder wrote: > No, I mean a journal of opinion which IS peer reviewed, and an > authority > whose literary criticism has passed such review. In other words, > considered sound, or at least interesting, by a committee.
This is such a complete misrepresentation of what peer reviewed academic journals are that I don't think there's really an answer for your question, Fred. The issue seems to be that you don't consider scholarship in the humanities to be legitimate scholarship, research, and knowledge. Which, ummm, I would hope that Wikipedia would not be so presumptuous. -Phil _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
