I don't see the point in suppressing the image of a naked pre-pubescent girl. Are you claiming that such an image is obscene or something? Wouldn't a conclusion like that be best left up to the courts to decide? I would have no problem suppressing images that a court has actually decided are obscene. But suppressing in-advance sure smells like censorship to me. And a type of censorship that no Western government is actually practicing. Will Johnson **************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" con... Thomas Larsen
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" content geni
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" con... Thomas Larsen
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" content Andrew Gray
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" con... David Gerard
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent"... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" content Wily D
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" content WJhonson
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" con... Thomas Larsen
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent"... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent"... Oldak Quill
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" content WJhonson
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" con... Thomas Larsen
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent"... geni
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent"... George Herbert
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" content WJhonson
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent" con... Thomas Larsen
- Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia and "indecent"... David Gerard
