> You are confusing a single thread of an argument with a complete > argument it. The it isn't illegal argument is used in conjunction with > other arguments (a quick glance at how much the article talks about > the image shows that it's inclusion is encyclopedic).
Does the image need to be shown, given its nature which is offensive to many, many people? >>Should >> Wikipedia, which claims to be an encyclopedia and reaches millions of >> people daily—many, if not _most_, of them school students—really be >> distributing images such as the one that prompted the IWF ban? > > In this case yes. Prove it :-). —Thomas Larsen _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
