We could as easily set up new pages to have a half-hour holding period; the problem is how to separate the need to remove the truly nasty material immediately. A delay period inevitably requires checking things twice.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 3:15 PM, geni <[email protected]> wrote: > 2008/12/31 Charlotte Webb <[email protected]>: >> If this is truly the root of all urgency we should turn on flaggedrevs. > > Try and keep up with marking new pages as patrolled for say half an hour. > >> In the beginning we would want Google to index only an article's last >> stable version (if one exists). >> >> After a certain grace period (to keep known-good content from >> vanishing), we can begin instructing Google to stop indexing articles >> which have no flagged rev and to de-index existing unflagged revs. > > There is no way to do this. > >> Some users like to nuke every {{third-world-topic-stub}} from >> geostationary orbit because it is like a video game to them. Faster >> pussycat, kill, kill, and let no mayfly die of natural causes. > > Not so much. Since it is generally fairly easy to argue for the > significance of many unwritten third world articles. > >> Perhaps some of this energy can be channeled toward other tasks. > > Experience suggests not. > > -- > geni > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > -- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
