<<In a message dated 1/7/2009 1:43:54 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
The real contributors function best in the topics that interest them, and if they're lucky they'll avoid the wrath of some autocratic know-nothing that wants to impose the literal interpretation of obscure policy. If you do not find primary sources acceptable that's fine; don't use them in your own writing. That does not justify your dictating such a semantic distinction on others.>> No organization can function with only fingers and no arms. "...do not find primary sources acceptable" has nothing whatsoever to do with my position or with policy. And "your dictating" is a situation that does not exist. "Semantic distinction" sounds a bit off-hand since most writers do use the terms "primary source" and "secondary source". I have never dictated my opinion upon others. Perhaps you would want to read the thread again, from the beginning and see why this line of thrust is not relevant. Will Johnson **************New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000026) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
