Stubs aren't bad. They may be about a topic which doesn't have many information.
-- Alvaro On 14-01-2009, at 12:57, Ken Arromdee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 [email protected] wrote: >> I am sorry I still do not get it. >> 1) Is your proposal going to completely hide "unfinished" articles >> from >> the >> public? If so who will be able to see them? Admins? Users?>> >> >> To hide those articles which are unfinished, or which the community >> has >> decided are unfinished. So the AfD process becomes simply the >> "Hide It >> process" much less contentious. > > You didn't answer the question about who gets to see them. > > Given most possible answers to this question, it'll just end up > being the same > as AFD. After all, right now an admin can see a deleted article. > >> <<3) Isn't your proposal hiding all stubs as well as some other >> articles? >> After all no stub by very definition is ready for "public >> consumption".>> >> >> No. It has nothing to do with stubs or non-stubs. Stubs are >> published >> today, and they would be published tomorrow. The only thing this >> does >> is provide a way for AfD to turn into something with less conflict. > > Well, is it about hiding articles ready for public consumption, or > isn't it? > If it is, stubs get hidden. If it's not, you shouldn't say it is. > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
