How you figure out which pages go in the non-google section is somewhere in between only FA and everything. Figuring out that exact point is up to debate :P
For example you can say any article with a "dispute" tag on it... But saying that means that some of our religion articles may not be googlable.... The answer to your question though is in between the two extremes. On 1/14/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > <<In a message dated 1/14/2009 8:54:02 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > Indeed but doesn't every non featured article fall under "not ready for > consumption" category? > - White Cat>> > > That's odd to me. You think an article needs to be FA before we should let > people find it in a search? > That seems to be a 10 percent rule, while I'm advocating a 90 percent rule. > That is that *most* articles are ready, only the few that already undergo > AfD might (and I use "might" advisedly) not be so ready. > This is a mole hill, not a mountain. > > Will Johnson > > > > > **************Inauguration '09: Get complete coverage from the nation's > capital.(http://www.aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000027) > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
