In a message dated 1/15/2009 5:56:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
My inexpert opinion is that convincing someone that they are required to pay you to use the material bearing the false copyright notice would be fraudulent intent, though I could be wrong.>> ------------------------------ Thank you for the text of that. Don't you think it's a bit odd to claim, that someone can steal the work of someone else for no payment whatsoever ? Copyright or no? If I work, and place a claim of copyright on my work, and you just take it, I really doubt that a *credible* excuse for theft is "he was claiming copyright without a real copyright". It's still theft of the work of someone else's effort. It takes me a few dozen hours to scan the pages of a public domain work. I have a perfect right to expect payment for someone else to use it. That capitalism. Will **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De cemailfooterNO62) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
