2009/2/2 Sam Korn <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote: >> I agree, that's definitely the most important statistic. A more useful >> statistic would be the age of the oldest unreviewed revision. > > 17.8 days > http://toolserver.org/~aka/cgi-bin/reviewcnt.cgi?lang=english&action=outofdatereviews&project=dewiki
Ask, and you shall receive! Thank you! So that's 10570 articles that have been waiting over a day (out of 12667 articles with out of date reviews). That's pretty bad... I would have expected a long tail type distribution. Any ideas why there are so many very out-of-date article compared to slightly out-of-date ones? _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
