There was no prior conflict as far as I know.  Just good faith
misunderstanding.  All in the pursuit of good doggerel.

-Durova

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Ray Saintonge <[email protected]> wrote:

> stevertigo wrote:
> > Durova, perhaps taking some cue from Gwern, wrote some poetically
> > critical and even ugly things above. But while Gwern mostly attacked
> > the concept of poetry on wikien-l (oh-so-cleverly I might add), Durova
> > appeared to have made it personal, and, for lack of a better word,
> > ugly. I don't quite understand how a silly or even stupid poem like
> > the one I posted might deserve such a response, but I have given it
> > some thought and broken it down a little.
> >
>
> Wow! I'm glad you let us know that it was a personal attack; the rest of
> us might not have known that otherwise.  I thought she was just
> commenting on your poetry.  She did use a limerick format.
>
> > I was motivated to write this by three things 1) personal hate attacks
> > and the concepts behind them need to be destroyed, 2) I needed to
> > address it in order to move on to other list contributions (I've been
> > away so long; I had forgotten we had jerks on this list) and 3)
> > correcting Durova's own personal misconceptions, which firstly appears
> > to be that she can personally attack someone, without real cause even,
> > and she would receive respect, love, and even grace for it. And
> > secondly, that she can attempt to destroy someone personally and not
> > meet certain undeniable correction.
> >
>
> Is there more to the metaphor in the verse than meets the eye, perhaps
> an unmentioned conflict that started long before this?
>
> > The dominant theories are:
> > 1) Durova and Gwern were motivated to make the point that poetry (even
> > bad poetry like mine) is altogether unwelcome on wikien. Attempting to
> > sound ironic, but sounding rather more unpleasant, they used poetry
> > itself to make their point. An insipid point, to be sure; even moreso
> > than my pointless, harmless, poem and the posting thereof. 2) Durova
> > (less so Gwern) appeared to have and express some animosity toward me
> > personally. I don't know quite why; I can't remember even having said
> > a word to her personally, on any matter at all.
> >
> > 3) It also occurs to me that certain people might mismanage certain
> > concepts: Someone without sufficient self-conceptual distance between
> > their head and their glutes might so misinterpret a harmless everyday
> > concept like "poo" and feel entirely soiled by it. The solution is not
> > to get personally uglier and uglier; lashing out at the very concept
> > as it were; but to simply use personal force of mind to create some
> > distance between the two bodily concepts in question.
> >
> > All is now forgiven. We disembodied online beings can now go and do
> > other and maybe better things. With all apologies.. for the poetry.
>
> Anyone who attempts poetry or other literary tricks in this forum does
> so at his own risk.  We have some very serious people here who relish
> the opportunity to add more weight to levity. I considered responding
> but the versification did not come to me straight away to express my
> vision of the poor ants scattering in all directions to avoid being
> turd-bombed by a one-footer.
>
> Ec
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>



-- 
http://durova.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to