I did read what you said, and it is bad enough. The notion that "anyone [with xn edits] can review", and no admin can revoke, makes the right less scrutinised that rollback - that has the effect of making the quality control utterly useless.
That someone has xn edits only means that they have not (yet) behaved in a manner to get blocked. It in no sense is equal to clue, perceptiveness, or diligence. The problem with widespread flagging is that in order to prevent backlogs, you will be under pressure to maximise the reviewers, and give the reviewers incentives to rack up numerous reviews per minute. That is inconsistent with useful scrutiny. [email protected] wrote: > I did not suggest doc that "anyone can review". > Review what I said again. > I said that established users can review, that it should be an > automatic right at a certain point and that admins cannot remove that > right. > > That is quite different from "anyone". > > > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
