Spectator-quality material? I presume you're being ironic! ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Gerard" <[email protected]> To: "English Wikipedia" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 17 April, 2009 00:10:00 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Rod Liddle, Spectator, on his Wikipedia article
2009/4/17 Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>: > I think our best chances are to use the media to fight this, not the > police/courts. We should issue a statement saying he's lying through > his teeth, if that is the case, or that his actions are seriously > inappropriate, if he did make the edits. There are people in the media > that are on our side, we should be able to get something published. I wouldn't issue a statement. You might however wish to write to his editor, documenting the evidence, and suggesting that his fictional piece is not up to scratch as Spectator-quality material. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
