2009/4/23 <[email protected]>: > I disagree that "Right" and "Wrong" have any meaning in a biographical > article. > Rather terms such as "has no evidence", "is cited to this source" would > have meaning. > Right and Wrong are such fluid creatures that we actually have courtrooms > where they are debated all day and still have no justice ;)
I think they do have meaning on an objective factual level. e.g. If the NYT gets a birthdate wrong and this error is perpetuated, that doesn't make it right however well cited it is. But that's a detail, not the point. Is there a formulation of what I said (the necessity of immediatism, the lack of the luxury of eventualism) that you'd agree with? - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
