On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:46 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree that some *specific* details of how a person was verified could > remain private. It is rather the method, scope, and result that should be > made public so many eyes can self-validate that it's a method that is not > trivial to fool. > > Will >
Good point, and sensible. On that note, I think we now agree more generally. FT2 _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
