On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Ray Saintonge <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> > The "Reliable Sources Noticeboard" does not represent the community as a > whole, and the "doubts" there are only raised by those who question a > source. Like AfD it has its own swarm of fellow travellers, who find it > convenient to concentrate their misery in one place. The normal > contributor is at a disadvantage there because he does not have the > culicid persistance of its regular inhabitants. > > A better place to discuss the reliability of a source would be the > article's talk page. The debate over whether some discussions are better held at a centralised, specialised venue, or on the article talk page, is a long one. There are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches. It would be good to have a discussion here about that. Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
