On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM, SlimVirgin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is the key point, I think. We don't have an absolute definition > of neutrality. We don't even have a "I know it when I see it" kind of > system. Neutrality -- everywhere -- is a work in progress. Now, > > That's exactly right. All this group would be looking for are good-faith > efforts to edit in accordance with the NPOV policy. It's not an attempt to > control content, but behaviour. Perhaps we should change the title to > reflect that. You lost me. If you say its all about the content, I'd be on board. You say its about "behaviour[-alism]," and I go now elsewhere to let you rethink the idea entirely. -SV _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
