Lilliputian nationalist form a network and come over to Wikipedia, turning the article about Blefuscu into a travesty. A lone Blefuscu native sees the imbalance and tries to address it, engaging in mediation and eventually arbitration. Afterward the Lilliputians successfully get the Blefuscuan topic banned because the Blefuscuan isn't adding to the imbalance of negative information about his own country.
Interesting. -Durova On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM, stevertigo <stv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM, SlimVirgin <slimvir...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > This is the key point, I think. We don't have an absolute definition > > of neutrality. We don't even have a "I know it when I see it" kind of > > system. Neutrality -- everywhere -- is a work in progress. Now, > > > > > > That's exactly right. All this group would be looking for are good-faith > > efforts to edit in accordance with the NPOV policy. It's not an attempt > to > > control content, but behaviour. Perhaps we should change the title to > > reflect that. > > > You lost me. If you say its all about the content, I'd be on board. You say > its about "behaviour[-alism]," and I go now elsewhere to let you rethink > the > idea entirely. > > -SV > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > -- http://durova.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
