> Hi, > > I am writing here pretty much as a last resort. I have been blocked by > an admin for 1 month, but despite repeated requests for an explanation > as to which policy or guideline justifies my block, four admins so far > have declined to answer this. I consider this to be a simple question > to ask, and would expect no less than the ability for an admin to be > able to justify the block by citing applicable policy. > > Please can someone look into this? > > I also am concerned that four admins have chosen to decline the > unblock request without feeling it necessary to provide the > explanation requested. > > In a court of law it's mandatory that the accused is given their > reasons, and the applicable statute or case law referred to. Is there > no similar requirement for justice within Wikipedia? > > I also think there should be a facility for admins who operate outside > of the law (if it can be called that) to be able to face consequences > for their actions by some higher governing body - does such a body > exist? > > Many thanks, > R E Broadley (User:Rebroad) >
You seem to have been blocked due to disruptive editing see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Rebroad_continues_behavior_which_got_him_blocked_just_last_week http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Secretary_of_State_for_Business,_Innovation_and_Skills&action=history Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
