Given that admins are supposed to follow wikipedia policy ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ADMINABUSE#Administrator_conduct), I'd suggest that it the admins who have failed to do this that are the liability to the project. I am very concerned that many seem to get away with flouting policy, and it seems very rare that admin access is taken away from admins that do this. I believe my edits speak for themselves as to why I am an asset to the project, and also the fact that I follow Wikipedia's policies, as well as contribute to a wide range of articles.
Regards, Ed On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:26 AM, R E > Broadley<[email protected]> wrote: > > My last 2 or 3 unblock requests have explained that the procedures > > mentioned in the guideline were not followed, so surely the block > > should not stand, should it? > > I really hope there's more to your request for unblocking than "the > procedures...were not followed". I would focus on explaining why > exactly you're an asset to the project, rather than a liability. > Nitpicking admins won't get you far (I hope). > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
