2009/7/14 Charles Matthews <[email protected]>: > Ian Woollard wrote: >> It's looking to me like 3.5 million is about the plateau, since the >> curve is bang on that, but we might make 4 million *eventually*. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Modelling_Wikipedia%27s_growth#Logistic_model_for_growth_in_article_count_of_Wikipedia >> > We'll know more around the beginning of 2010. In my view something is > likely to change in the direction of people valuing lists of "missing > articles" more, when it is clearer that drive-by creation is getting > drossier by the month (which is what that model implies). Of course I > can't quantify that: I know it is still easy to come up with sets of > 1000 topics that we don't cover at all well, and the total of redlinks > is still large. > > Charles
Redlinks in general perhaps. Redlinks in articles a significant number of people actually read less so. -- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
