So, can someone fill me in on why we're laughing at this? From the article:
---- To psychologists, to render the Rorschach test meaningless would be a particularly painful development because there has been so much research conducted — tens of thousands of papers, by Dr. Smith’s estimate — to try to link a patient’s responses to certain psychological conditions. Yes, new inkblots could be used, these advocates concede, but those blots would not have had the research — “the normative data,” in the language of researchers — that allows the answers to be put into a larger context. ---- That seems like a pretty reasonable concern to me. To destroy the effectiveness of a test that has that kind of research background to it (tens of thousands of papers!!) doesn't seem like a laughing matter. Maybe it's unavoidable. Maybe it's collateral damage. But the concern that publishing it on Wikipedia is different from publishing it elsewhere on the web seems legitimate. Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
