On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Ray Saintonge wrote: >So what if there have been tens of thousands of papers on the >Rorschachs! The geocentric universe was impervious to criticism for >much longer. >the incomes of those psychologists who are in denial about their game of >follow-the-leader. NPOV is contrary to such occult practices.
Oh... and does this mean that if you were to be convinced that showing the blots does cause harm, you would then support their removal? Or is your position more absolutist, and you don't really care about whether they cause harm or not? >If the tests are truly scientific they will be just as >scientific when exposed to open criticism. You're equivocating on the meaning of "scientific" here--if it means "be more able to properly use them on other people", yes. If it means "be more able to properly use them on himself", no. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
