In a message dated 8/31/2009 11:47:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ft2.w...@gmail.com writes:
> - WikiTrust might be described as "a way to see how long an edit > endured > and how much trust it seems to have"; in most users' hands it'll be > "its > colored red/blue so its right/wrong." > - People won't think, they'll assume and rely.>> ------------------- Interesting to see this by virtue of repetition in our mirrors. And our pseudo-mirrors who *don't* event state that they mirrored us. Then after a phrase has been cut from our version due to lack of source, it's put back in citing a past mirror who hasn't removed it.... Circular. Unsourced statement one has "high trust" because it's been there for two years, without a source. When a source is found contradicting it, will there be a big fight because "100 editors has passed on this and haven't reverted it!" .... Shades of past warfare. Will Johnson _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
