On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:09 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In a message dated 8/31/2009 11:47:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > >> - WikiTrust might be described as "a way to see how long an edit >> endured >> and how much trust it seems to have"; in most users' hands it'll be >> "its >> colored red/blue so its right/wrong." >> - People won't think, they'll assume and rely.>> > > ------------------- > > Interesting to see this by virtue of repetition in our mirrors. > And our pseudo-mirrors who *don't* event state that they mirrored us. > Then after a phrase has been cut from our version due to lack of source, > it's put back in citing a past mirror who hasn't removed it.... > > Circular.
I found a Wikimania presentation earlier that showed colour coding of text according to trustworthiness and also rated contributors on a similar scale. I can't seem to find it again now though. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
