On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>wrote:
> 2009/9/5 <[email protected]>: > > In a message dated 9/5/2009 2:37:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > > [email protected] writes: > > > > > >> Either Google or the publisher/author of the book you viewed. People > >> get sued for bypassing DRM, why couldn't they be sued for bypassing > >> restrictions on Google books?>> > > > > Google suffers no damage from people in Namibia viewing a book through a > > proxy. > > Ok, so it would be publisher or author, then. And how are they going to find out about it? Yes people get sued for bypassing DRM (*), but not many. (*) Maybe. Has anyone been successfully sued for merely *bypassing* DRM, and not trafficking in DRM bypassing devices? The very short list of DRM cases I know of are all trafficking cases. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
