2009/9/5 <[email protected]>: > In a message dated 9/5/2009 1:18:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > >> Contract violation *is* illegal. (Assuming a website ToS is a binding >> contract - has that ever been tested in court?)>> > > Piffle. Who is going to sue? Who has standing to sue? > I really see this as a non-starter.
Either Google or the publisher/author of the book you viewed. People get sued for bypassing DRM, why couldn't they be sued for bypassing restrictions on Google books? _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
