Im working on a toolserver based tool if anyone would be interested. Im doing some basic parsing now.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:10 PM, stevertigo <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2009/9/18 Charles Matthews <[email protected]>: > >> Yes, good, but {{reflist}} is also progress and needs to be made > compatible. > David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Shirley {{reflist}} should be made options for <references>. Does it > > do anything other than pretty formatting? > > Agree with David, and even without considering the superficial > differences, a hard-coded function should take preference over a > template hack. The latter doesn't appear to solve the present issue > which is editing being obstructed by large in-text citations. Andrew's > hack seems to be more than sufficient. > > The issue then is that a bot would be relied upon to do the moves - > section edits means that adding citations will continue to work in the > normal in-text fashion, and even in less common full-page edits we > don't necessarily expect people to manually put citations in the > references section. So.. a massive wave of site-wide bot-edits > followed by a persistent bot? > > Be interesting to see if just leaving a site-wide worknote above the > titlespace would get most of the job done with user cycles. > > -Stevertigo > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
