Gwern Branwen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Gwern Branwen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Now we can {{note|foo}}^W^W{{r|foo}} like it's 2005! >>> >>> But seriously, I find this discouraging - a sign of dysfunctionality. >>> All the work put in to switch to <ref> and now we're switching *back* >>> to something I find indistinguishable from the original? I guess I'll >>> be opting out of whatever the next switch will be... >>> >> Hmm, I don't recall how {{note}} worked - is the current template what >> you're referring to? >> > > Not sure. I drank the <ref> kool-aid and haven't used {{note}} in years. > [[Wikipedia:Footnote3]] explains it all. I can't work out the difference, except maybe it took Dragons flight a lot of work to give us what we already had?
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
