Andrew Gray wrote: > I think we can easily distinguish, though; the > notability-by-association thing really needs most of the set to be > desirable topics for articles (*most* ski runs are interesting, or at > least let us assume they are for this discussion!) and for that set to > be well-defined (you can always tell if a ski run is in Australia or > not). Yes, this is exactly the sort of gradation we should have and should be able to implement, but is also the sort of gradation that the NOTINHERITED group of editors seek to stamp out. The notability guidance has also become a spanner in the works of Summary Style. You can't now split an article up if it is too long unless you split it in a way such that each separate article is notable by itself. And even if you manage to do that, there are editors who will accuse you of forking.
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
