Surreptitiousness wrote: > Andrew Gray wrote: > >> I think we can easily distinguish, though; the >> notability-by-association thing really needs most of the set to be >> desirable topics for articles (*most* ski runs are interesting, or at >> least let us assume they are for this discussion!) and for that set to >> be well-defined (you can always tell if a ski run is in Australia or >> not). >> > Yes, this is exactly the sort of gradation we should have and should be > able to implement, but is also the sort of gradation that the > NOTINHERITED group of editors seek to stamp out. The notability guidance > has also become a spanner in the works of Summary Style. You can't now > split an article up if it is too long unless you split it in a way such > that each separate article is notable by itself. And even if you manage > to do that, there are editors who will accuse you of forking. > Rightly, in my view. I come down on the (conservative) side of this discussion, and agree with the now-ancient decision that article space should not admit subpages (which is what subarticles without credible free-standing topics amount to).
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
