On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Charles Matthews <[email protected]> wrote: > Apoc 2400 wrote: >> This discussion about splitting off sections to articles, notability and >> undue weight reminded me of something I encountered recently: >> >> What do you do if you find an article with a short description of the >> subject followed by a huge criticism/controversy section with subsections >> for every negative opinion about the subject ever published? It is sourced >> so just removing most of it will get you reverted by the people who wrote >> the article. >> > Hmm, I thought such "criticism sections" had been deprecated for quite a > few years now. One thing to do is to add {{criticism section}}, the > wording of which is what I recall (that criticism is better integrated > into an article). In the hugeness case the integration would make the > article look like the "attack article" it probably is.
We have around 125 articles with "criticism of" in the title: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&redirs=1&search=intitle%3Acriticism%2Bof&fulltext=Search&ns0=1 > None of WP:CRIT, WP:NOCRIT and WP:CRIS addressing the issue seem to have > made it past being an essay into a guideline. Yes. Failing guidelines, those pages would seem to be where to discuss this. Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
