Charles Matthews <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, I thought such "criticism sections" had been deprecated for quite a > few years now. One thing to do is to add {{criticism section}}, the > wording of which is what I recall (that criticism is better integrated > into an article). In the hugeness case the integration would make the > article look like the "attack article" it probably is. > None of WP:CRIT, WP:NOCRIT and WP:CRIS addressing the issue seem to have made > it past being an essay into a guideline.
Strange, isn't it Charles, that the deprecation of criticism sections/articles would be the convention for "quite a few years now" and yet no attempt at its formalization has "made it past being an essay into a guideline" let alone policy? Stranger still, is it not, that this same invisible notion can still find abuse as the centerpiece of a large-enough edit war such that resulted in the poorly-conceptualized case given (disrespectfully) the Prez' name? More thing on my to-do list: Get Arbcom to actually deal with adjudicating policy and sections therein. - Stevertigo _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
