"Apoc 2400" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... (...) > What do you do if you find an article with a short description of the > subject followed by a huge criticism/controversy section with subsections > for every negative opinion about the subject ever published? (...)
I realize that I am in a subject that might not be encyclopedic, because it is controversial, and I avoid it, however much I want the article to come to my decision. If a torrent of verbiage and commercially, racially, or ideologically motivated information has established a concept that is at odds with a foundation, then maybe it does not require my attack. It should fall on its own. If it seems to hav a life of its own, that is just the nature of politics, where I do not want to be. _______ Handy Guide to Modern Science: 1. If it's green or it wiggles, it's biology. 2. If it stinks, it's chemistry. 3. If it doesn't work, it's physics. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
