Charles Matthews <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe you are misreading what is said here. It is not being stated > that Arbcom has no time to do the job. Rather, it is being stated that > if it wants to do the job, it doesn't also have the time to deal with > all the heckling and rewriting of history that can go on after a case is > closed.
I appreciate the correction. My point simply was that there is a place for "heckling," even after the close of the case. The issue then is how to focus that signal - irritating as worn-out-brakes it may be - into something coherent. The distinction here is that its a fatal error to characterize what people say as just wiki-lawyering, when the issue is solveable through broader signal enhancing techniques, that if Arbcom wants to, we can start exploring. -Stevertigo _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
