George Herbert wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Surreptitiousness > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hmmm. To do that I suppose you would have to create some rules on who >> can run. Maybe bar admins from running for starters, that might reduce >> the risk of arbcom siding with admins. I don't think the community would >> allow Jimmy to appoint as he sees fit anymore, but if the board mandated >> a couple of seats had to be reserved fro picks, that might shake things >> up. That would involve the board getting down in the mud though, which >> they try not to do. >> > > You can't just throw out a possible new arbcom membership requirement > without considering the effects. > You can't? Is this why nothing ever changes? People are too scared too propose anything radical? Hey, how about two randomly selected editors assigned to each case? You could build a pool of interested parties. Maybe former members would consider standing on this basis? Who knows...
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
