2009/9/26 David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com>: > 2009/9/26 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>: > >> I think we should have flagged revs for as many articles as we can >> keep up-to-date with. If it takes more than 5 minutes (preferably 1 >> minute) to review an edit (except for occasional times when somehow a >> backlog builds up and it takes a few minutes for people to realise and >> work through it), then we have failed. If we can have every single >> article on flagged revs and still keep on top of them, then we should >> do that. If we can't, then we should keep it to just a small number of >> articles that really need it. > > > de:wp manages about one third in the first hour. That's really not > enough unless there's sone urgent need to stop Wikipedia newbie > editing dead.
No, IMO they have failed. It should be literally 100% of edits reviews in 5 minutes the vast majority of the time. I would set a target of the lag on Special:OldReviewedPages should be less than 5 minutes 99% of the time. If we fail to reach that target, we need to reduce the number of articles we are using the extension on. I really think that is achievable though, even with every article included - we already have RC-patrollers checking most edits within a few minutes and this extension would make it much easier to avoid duplicate effort. Do any of the vandal-fighter tools (like Huggle) handle working through the OldReviewedPages in order? (We need New Page patrollers to make sure every new page gets its first review very quickly - they are usually good at keeping on top of new pages.) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l