2009/9/26 Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>:
> 2009/9/26 David Gerard <[email protected]>:

>> de:wp manages about one third in the first hour. That's really not
>> enough unless there's sone urgent need to stop Wikipedia newbie
>> editing dead.

> No, IMO they have failed. It should be literally 100% of edits reviews
> in 5 minutes the vast majority of the time. I would set a target of
> the lag on Special:OldReviewedPages should be less than 5 minutes 99%
> of the time. If we fail to reach that target, we need to reduce the
> number of articles we are using the extension on. I really think that
> is achievable though, even with every article included - we already
> have RC-patrollers checking most edits within a few minutes and this
> extension would make it much easier to avoid duplicate effort. Do any
> of the vandal-fighter tools (like Huggle) handle working through the
> OldReviewedPages in order? (We need New Page patrollers to make sure
> every new page gets its first review very quickly - they are usually
> good at keeping on top of new pages.)


http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Markierungsstatistik

Those numbers would be a disaster. This I think is why the trial is so limited.


- d.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to