Three were "on the fence" so while the article may report a 55% success rate, it also is stating a 32% failure rate.
~A On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:33, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Interesting; it says that of 22 articles reviewed, 12 were found to >> not meet even Wikipedia's criteria for featured articles. The abstract >> advises scholars not to "naively believe [Wikipedia's] assertions of >> quality." >> > > Sorry, that was incorrect - 12 of 22 *did* pass the criteria, and the > remainder did not. > > ~Nathan > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
