On 19 April 2010 18:46, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder if there might be a subtle bias playing into these reviews. > Perhaps if reviewers begin with the assumption that the article was > written by amateur hobbyists, that influences the outcome. If Lindsey > went back to them and let them know that the articles had been written > or comprehensively reviewed by recognized experts, would that alter > the results?
This is why the useful reviews of quality (e.g. Wikipedia vs Britannica for Nature) were done at least single-blind. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
