On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Keith Old <keith...@gmail.com> wrote: > The researchers write in their study's abstract, to be presented at the > current annual meeting of theAmerican Society of Clinical > Oncology<http://chicago2010.asco.org/>: > "Although the Wiki resource had similar accuracy and depth to the > professionally edited database, it was significantly less readable. Further > research is required to assess how this influences patients' understanding > and retention."
Does this signal some advance in public perception of Wikipedia? At last we leave behind the question "is it accurate", and move on to "is it well written"? Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
