No, it's a disastrous idea; it's inherently antithetic to NPOV. What you'd be doing is creating articles that are deliberately non NPOV.
Content FORKS are never, ever desirable. On 27/06/2010, Fred Bauder <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, articles from diverse points of view would be good. > > Fred Bauder > >> I have come across topics that are approached differently by different >> groups and thought that parallel articles might be appropriate in >> those cases. I'd like a wider view on the topic. Here is where I've >> discussed it on talk pages: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism#Jewish_Versions_of_articles >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David#King_David_in_Judaism >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WikiEN-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > -- -Ian Woollard _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
