And war to control the content of the "NPOV" article is not a disastrous idea?
Fred Bauder > No, it's a disastrous idea; it's inherently antithetic to NPOV. What > you'd be doing is creating articles that are deliberately non NPOV. > > Content FORKS are never, ever desirable. > > On 27/06/2010, Fred Bauder <fredb...@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> Yes, articles from diverse points of view would be good. >> >> Fred Bauder >> >>> I have come across topics that are approached differently by different >>> groups and thought that parallel articles might be appropriate in >>> those cases. I'd like a wider view on the topic. Here is where I've >>> discussed it on talk pages: >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism#Jewish_Versions_of_articles >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David#King_David_in_Judaism >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> WikiEN-l mailing list >>> WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WikiEN-l mailing list >> WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >> > > > -- > -Ian Woollard > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
