On 18/07/2010, FT2 <[email protected]> wrote:
> IAR isn't for a regular, predictable, situation where a generic agreed
> solution would be better, and not for a sourcing issue or "systematic
> problem" like this. More and more often there is a chance (small in any
> given case, large overall) that important information for an article may be
> blog published, so we do have a genuine issue here.

IAR is a rule that was written early-on in the Wikipedia because
particularly then, the rules weren't very good, and this was intended
to allow the Wikipedia to proceed before better rules could be
drafted.

-- 
-Ian Woollard

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to