on 2/1/11 5:32 PM, David Goodman at [email protected] wrote: <Snip> > > We have something that has proven successful far beyond any > expectations. It puzzles me why anyone would want to risk a > fundamental change in its structure.
Because it, as well as its needs, have grown beyond its original structure. > Let it continue as far as > relative anarchy can take it. And then what, David? It cannot do everything, or suit > everybody. If one wants something different, try other projects. David, are you really saying what I hear you saying - ["]If you don't like the way things are, go someplace else["]?! Marc <Snip> > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:47 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 1 February 2011 20:33, Fred Bauder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You propose a political boss. Utterly unacceptable, Napoleonic even. >> >> >> The arbcom are already politicians, elected and all. Wikipedia is a >> city of 160,000 people any given month. Politics happens when two >> people are in the same room, let alone 160,000. >> >> >> - d. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WikiEN-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >> > > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
