On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:12 PM, George Herbert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Ken Arromdee <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, wiki wrote: >>> The notion that what new editors really value is the ability to participate >>> in policy discussions, and that any move away from that is "dangerous" is >>> just more nonsense of the libertine variety. We are building an encyclopedia >>> - remember that? The rest is just pragmatic sausage making. >> >> Well, I can tell you I left because of a policy decision (well, there were a >> whole bunch of things but the policy decision was one of the worst.) > > ...And a policy discussion which was driven by a small, vocal, and > policy-active minority, who drove a solution upstream against a > consensus gap. > > The long term damage that incident did has been consistently shoveled > under the rug.
Which incident are you both talking about? If Ken's user page makes it obvious, just say that, but I can't immediately remember what you are both talking about here. Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
