> > >>> >>>> >>>>> I could make out the last sentence >>>>> which >>>>> contained the phrases, "meaning of consensus", and "consent of the >>>>> entire >>>>> community". No one has yet defined for me the "meaning of >>>>> consensus", >>>>> nor >>>>> described for me how the "consent of the entire community" is >>>>> determined. >>>>> >>>>> Marc >>>>> >>>> on 2/1/11 7:52 PM, Fred Bauder at [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> We discuss policy issues at length, consider the reasons for adopting >>>> alternatives, and come to agreement. >>>> >>> C'mon Fred, isn't that rather vague? What I'm asking (again) is, after >>> the >>> discussion is other, how is it determined that a consensus of the >>> Community >>> has been reached? >>> >>> Marc >> > on 2/1/11 9:24 PM, Fred Bauder at [email protected] wrote: > >> People agree and support the decision. >> > Fred, who are these people that are making these decisions and declaring > that there in Community consensus, knowing that this "consensus" cannot > be > factually validated? > > Marc
The rising of the sun could not be factually validated if we thought like that. People write on the talk page of the policy that they agree; do not change the language of the policy, which anyone can edit, remember; and follow it. Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
